Tema: Partiet

Partiet

Jørn Andersen: Hvorfor Internationale Socialister?
Socialistisk Arbejderavis nr. 363, feb 18 – side 12
Note: Selv om socialister er i front for at bekæmpe racisme, nedskæringer osv., så er det ikke det egentlige formål med Internationale Socialister.
 

Chris Newlove: Book review: Living Leninism
International Socialism Journal nr. 145, jan 15 – side 216
Note: Paul Le Blanc, Unfinished Leninism: The Rise and Return of a Revolutionary Doctrine (Haymarket, 2014), £12.99
 

Gareth Jenkins + Kevin Corr: The case of the disappearing Lenin
International Socialism Journal nr. 144, okt 14 – side 37
Note: What, if anything, do modern day socialists have to learn from Lenin? Capitalism is mired in its deepest and longest crisis since the 1930s, producing bitter discontent that in places overflows into mass resistance and even revolutions. With Stalinism all but dead and traditional reformist parties offering little beyond doing austerity in a fairer manner, revolution from below would seem to be an idea whose time has at long last returned.
 

Ian Birchall: A note on factions
Socialist Review nr. 381, jun 13 
Note: Alex Callinicos (“Is Leninism finished?” SR, February 2013) claims that during the recent internal debate in the SWP some comrades were “arguing for...a different model involving a much looser and weaker leadership, internal debate that continually reopens decisions already made, and permanent factions (currently factions are only allowed in the discussion period leading up to the annual party conference).”
 

Sameh Naguib: Egypt: Get ready to change the world
Socialist Worker nr. 2361, jul 13 – side 14
Note: The Revolutionary Socialists sprung from underground to play a leading role in Egypt’s revolt. Sameh Naguib explains how they built a party to shape the struggle.
 

Alex Callinicos: What sort of party do we need?
Socialist Review nr. 382, jul 13 – side 21
Note: In our ongoing series of debates on the role of Leninism today, Alex Callinicos replies to Ian Birchall’s contribution in last month’s Review. He returns to the fundamentals of Leninist organisation and presents a different account of the political arguments of the 1980s.
 

Ian Birchall: What does it mean to be a Leninist?
Socialist Review nr. 381, jun 13 – side 22
Note: In February’s issue of Socialist Review Alex Callinicos addressed the claim that Leninism is finished. Here, Ian Birchall responds to Alex arguing that he asks the question, but does not fully answer it.
 

Dennis Strøm Petersen + Pelle Vedel Drews: Hvorfor blive organiseret socialist?
Socialistisk Arbejderavis nr. 293, dec 09 – side 13
Note: På Århus Universitet, var der i 70erne en studiegruppe, der blev kaldt Mediciner Fronten. Mediciner Fronten var en gruppe af venstreorienteret medicinstuderende, som sammen læste Kapitalen og diskuterede Marx og den kapitalistiske samfundsstruktur.
 

John Molyneux: On party democracy
International Socialism Journal nr. 124, okt 09 – side 137
Note: This article examines the much disputed issue of internal party democracy in the light of the Marxist tradition and past and recent experience.
 

Jørn Andersen: Antikapitalisme og revolutionært parti
Socialistisk Arbejderavis nr. 286, feb 09 – side 13
Note: Et revolutionært socialistisk masseparti er en afgørende forudsætning for at kunne erstatte kapitalismen med et socialistisk arbejderdemokrati.
 

Chris Bambery: Building a radical left for the future
Socialist Worker nr. 2130, dec 08 – side 4
Note: Mass movements and rebellions can erupt suddenly. The left must win these movements to new, revolutionary ideas and lead the rejection of the old ideas that, if re-established, can dissipate and restrict movements and their demands.
 

John Molyneux: Revolution and the party
Socialist Worker nr. 2092, mar 08 – side 13
Note: Organisation is vital to win fundamental change. John Molyneux asks what sort of party we need and looks at some lessons from previous mass struggles.
 

Paul Blackledge: Lenin: What was done
International Socialism Journal nr. 111, jun 06 – side 111
Note: A review of Lars T Lih: "Lenin Rediscovered: What is to be Done? in Context" (Brill, Historical Materialism series, 2006), euro 129
 

Colin Barker: Vi behøver et parti af ledere for at kunne forandre verden
Socialistisk Arbejderavis nr. 230, jun 04 – side 11
Note: Bevægelser fra neden kan forandre verden. En bevægelsens styrke beror på evnen til at mobilisere rigtig mange mennesker. Men der er et problem. Sådanne bevægelser er blandede og modsætningsfyldte.
 

Mikkel Birk Jespersen: Det revolutionære parti: Dynamoen i den anti-kapitalistiske kamp
Socialistisk Arbejderavis nr. 207, okt 02 – side 9
Note: Hvorfor organiserer vi socialister os i et parti? Er det overhovedet nødvendigt? Og er tiden ikke løbet fra partier, især de her små obskure venstrefløjsstørrelser? Både ja og nej.
 

Daniel Bensaïd: Leaps! Leaps! Leaps!
International Socialism Journal nr. 95, jun 02 – side 73
Note: Lenin's theory of the revolutionary party has long been one of the most debated questions on the left. Here we print three articles on Leninism based on speeches given at the Marxism 2001 conference. Slavoj Žižek, author of 'Did Somebody Say Totalitarianism?', Daniel Bensaïd, a leading member of the Revolutionary Communist League in France, and John Rees, author of The Algebra of Revolution, put forward their vieves on the kind of organisation we need in the movement today.
 

Slavoj Žižek: A cyberspace Lenin – why not?
International Socialism Journal nr. 95, jun 02 – side 87
Note: Lenin's theory of the revolutionary party has long been one of the most debated questions on the left. Here we print three articles on Leninism based on speeches given at the Marxism 2001 conference. Slavoj Žižek, author of 'Did Somebody Say Totalitarianism?', Daniel Bensaïd, a leading member of the Revolutionary Communist League in France, and John Rees, author of The Algebra of Revolution, put forward their vieves on the kind of organisation we need in the movement today.
 

John Rees: Leninism in the 21st century
International Socialism Journal nr. 95, jun 02 – side 101
Note: Lenin's theory of the revolutionary party has long been one of the most debated questions on the left. Here we print three articles on Leninism based on speeches given at the Marxism 2001 conference. Slavoj Žižek, author of 'Did Somebody Say Totalitarianism?', Daniel Bensaïd, a leading member of the Revolutionary Communist League in France, and John Rees, author of The Algebra of Revolution, put forward their vieves on the kind of organisation we need in the movement today.
 

Paul Foot: Workers' movement: The party's just begun
Socialist Review nr. 259, jan 02 – side 16
Note: Spontaneous activity is not enough – we need collective organisation
Alt. url: Socialist Review Index
 

Marxisme i hverdagen: Partiet og bevægelsen
Socialistisk Arbejderavis nr. 188, dec 00 – side 7
Note: Flere og flere mennesker verden over har taget kampen op mod systemet af flere forskellige årsager. Spørgsmålet er så om det revolutionære parti dermed mister sin eksistens-berettigelse.
 

Jørn Andersen: Leon Trotskij: “Læren af Oktober”: Læren af den russiske revolution
Socialistisk Arbejderavis nr. 170, nov 97 – side 6
Note: Trotskijs pjece Læren af Oktober sammenfatter de russiske bolsjevikkers erfaringer med at lave revolution i perioden fra februar til oktober 1917.
 

Dorte Lange: Det revolutionære parti: Et anderledes parti
Socialistisk Arbejderavis nr. 129, feb 96 – side 6
Note: Revolutionære socialister ønsker ikke at repræsentere en passiv arbejderklasse, men at føre en politisk kamp for, at arbejderklassen må befri sig selv.
 

Tom Christiansen: Hvorfor er det vigtigt at organisere sig
Socialistisk Arbejderavis nr. 127, jan 96 – side 6
Note: Lenin beskriver i “Hvad må der gøres”, at opgaven for de revolutionære er at hæve arbejdernes bevidsthed op fra de konkrete sager og til en revolutionær bevidsthed.
 

Anne Kaltoft: Hvorfor sælger vi Socialistisk Arbejderavis?
Socialistisk Arbejderavis nr. 25, dec 86 – side 11
Note: Hvorfor står ISere på gaden den ene uge efter den anden med røde næser og blå lår, mens de tålmodigt modtager det ene “NEJ, jeg vil ikke købe jeres avis” efter det andet?
 

Ole Mølholm Jensen: Marxismens betydning: Lenin og partiet i dag
Socialistisk Arbejderavis nr. 2, nov 84 – side 7
Note: Få emner har affødt så megen diskussion som spørgsmålet om, hvad et revolutionært parti er og hvilke opgaver et revolutionært parti har.
 

Jørgen Lund: Revolutioner og partiet
Socialistisk Arbejderavis nr. 1, okt 84 – side 6
Note: “Arbejderklassens befrielse må være dens eget værk”, skrev Karl Marx. Det er kun arbejderklassen, som kan erobre magten over produktionen og kæmpe socialismen igennem som svar på kapitalismens krise og udbytning.
 

Alex Callinicos: Party and class before 1917
International Socialism Journal nr. 24, jun 84 – side 74
 

Donny Gluckstein: The missing party
International Socialism Journal nr. 22, dec 83 – side 3
 

Chris Harman: What sort of party: For Democratic Centralism
Socialist Review nr. 4, jul 78 – side 37
Note: Reply to Richard Kuper: Organisation and Participation (Socialist Review 4)
Richard Kuper’s case rests on six main arguments. Each seems at first sight to be almost unquestionable. Each is, in reality, fundamentally false and dangerous.
 

Der blev fundet 29 artikler

 

Til hovedgruppe – Til temaoversigt

 

Toppen af siden